Paul Visciano Blogs

Sci-Fi Labs · Essay

Surveillance Pricing Is the Quiet Version of the Same Problem

The FTC asked for comment on personalized pricing. The same data that powers ads and recommendations is already being used to charge you a different price than the person next to you.

Silhouette between a private local knowledge graph and corporate data towers using personal data for price discrimination
Data that leaves the device becomes someone else’s pricing model.

This week the FTC asked for public comment on a proposed enforcement policy about personalized pricing — what privacy advocates call surveillance pricing. Companies already collect browsing history, location, household signals, and device fingerprints. The proposal says that using that data to set a different price for you than for the person next to you, without clear disclosure, can be a deceptive practice under the FTC Act.

The examples are concrete. A delivery service charges more for milk because it knows multiple children live at the address. A hotel raises the rate because signals suggest the traveler is attending a funeral. A ride-hailing app prices a hospital trip higher because the data implies urgency. The price you see is not the market price; it is an estimate of what you will tolerate.

None of this requires a new breakthrough in AI. It is the ordinary outcome of treating personal data as free raw material.

The same data, a different bill

The same data that trains recommendation models and ad targeting also trains price discrimination. Once the data leaves your device, the boundary is gone. You can still use the service, but you no longer control how the profile is applied against you.

That is the quiet version of the same problem that runs through the rest of the Sci-Fi Labs writing: platforms and brokers treat your life as inventory. Surveillance pricing is simply the bill arriving for years of free extraction.

Why the local stack matters

One practical response is to keep the data on hardware you own. That is what Knowledge Graph is for: a private spatial memory system that runs entirely on your own machine. Photos, conversations, voice notes, and personal history stay on disk. You query them with a local model. Nothing is uploaded.

The current stack runs offline on a 16GB laptop — Llama.cpp for inference, LightRAG for retrieval, Whisper for voice, and a Three.js infinite canvas for the spatial interface. There is no API key, no remote embedding service, no silent upload. Unplug the network and the system keeps working. That offline test is the practical proof that nothing is leaving.

Where is Paul? is the public-facing spatial layer — a 3D globe and timeline of real moments — but the same rule applies to the private archive that feeds it. The published site is a demo. The real product is the copy you run on your own machine. Both are just websites, so they open in a browser, on a phone, or inside Vision Pro without a special store or runtime. The data layer stays local by design.

Seed-phrase discipline for life data

Crypto people already understand the seed-phrase mindset. Guard the keys or lose the asset. Personal data deserves the same discipline. Running the model and the graph on hardware you own is the quiet refusal of the bargain that treats your life as free training data and free pricing signals.

The FTC action is useful because it makes the practice visible. Visibility is not the same as control. Control starts when the data never leaves in the first place.

Watch

More from Sci-Fi Labs

Reclaim your data → Who has your data? → Knowledge Graph → Where is Paul? →